HSG_Logo_EN_RGB

Shawna N. Smith

Course location

Home university

University of St.Gallen
University of Michigan

Course location

University of St.Gallen

Home university

University of Michigan
Shawna
Shawna N. Smith is currently a Research Assistant Professor at the University of Michigan Medical School and the Institute for Social Research Quantitative Methods Program. She is also a faculty affiliate of the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, the Michigan Program for Value Enhancement, and the Data Science for Dynamic Decision Making lab. Dr. Smith is a health services researcher and implementation scientist. Her research focuses on using innovative experimental methods for improving access to evidence-based care through development of implementation interventions that encourage behavior change and evidence-based practice uptake. Dr. Smith also works in mobile health, and is a co-author of several key papers on just-in-time adaptive interventions JITAI) in mobile health. As an applied methodologist, Dr. Smith regularly teaches workshops on two innovative methods for informing adaptive interventions—sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) and micro-randomized trials (MRT). Dr. Smith’s work has been funded by the US National Institutes of Health, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Institute for Education, and numerous foundations. In addition to teaching with GSERM, Dr. Smith has been an instructor with the ICPSR Summer Program since 2012.

Courses taught by this instructor

Course

Description

Instructor

Level

B = Basic
M = Intermediate
A = Advanced

Next course

Location

Course

Description

Instructor

Level

B = Basic
M = Intermediate
A = Advanced

Location

Next course

Foundations of Machine Learning and Regression Methods for Categorical Outcomes

By nature or by measurement, dependent variables of interest to social and behavioral scientists are frequently categorical. Outcomes that include several ranked or unranked, non- continuous categories–like vote choice, social media platform preference, brand loyalty, and/or condom use—are often of interest, with scientists expressly interested in developing models to explain or classify variation therein. Explanatory models are process-focused, and aim to determine the individual impact of factors that contribute to a particular outcome, often based on a priori theory—e.g., “How does social class affect whether an individual voted for the Conservatives in 2019?”; classification models, alternatively, are outcome-focused, and aim to identify the set of factors that most accurately classify (or predict) a particular outcome—e.g., “How do the Tories best use information from polls, geography, weather, Twitter feeds, and/or social demographics to predict who voted Conservative in 2019?” Chances are your research involves a categorical outcome—binary, ordinal, or multinomial— and thus options thus abound for the modeling approach(es) you might take to address your research question of interest. This course is designed to provide an overview of a number of parametric and non-parametric approaches to exploring your outcome of interest, via both explanatory and classification perspectives. At the end of this course, you should have a clear understanding as to which types of models and methods are available to answer different research questions, and also have experience applying a varied toolkit of these models.
...

...

A

Foundations of Machine Learning and Regression Methods for Categorical Outcomes

By nature or by measurement, dependent variables of interest to social and behavioral scientists are frequently categorical. Outcomes that include several ranked or unranked, non- continuous categories–like vote choice, social media platform preference, brand loyalty, and/or condom use—are often of interest, with scientists expressly interested in developing models to explain or classify variation therein. Explanatory models are process-focused, and aim to determine the individual impact of factors that contribute to a particular outcome, often based on a priori theory—e.g., “How does social class affect whether an individual voted for the Conservatives in 2019?”; classification models, alternatively, are outcome-focused, and aim to identify the set of factors that most accurately classify (or predict) a particular outcome—e.g., “How do the Tories best use information from polls, geography, weather, Twitter feeds, and/or social demographics to predict who voted Conservative in 2019?” Chances are your research involves a categorical outcome—binary, ordinal, or multinomial— and thus options thus abound for the modeling approach(es) you might take to address your research question of interest. This course is designed to provide an overview of a number of parametric and non-parametric approaches to exploring your outcome of interest, via both explanatory and classification perspectives. At the end of this course, you should have a clear understanding as to which types of models and methods are available to answer different research questions, and also have experience applying a varied toolkit of these models.
...

...